Re: pg_dump issues
| От | Alvaro Herrera |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: pg_dump issues |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 1317656240-sup-777@alvh.no-ip.org обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: pg_dump issues (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
| Ответы |
Re: pg_dump issues
|
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
Excerpts from Tom Lane's message of lun oct 03 01:47:18 -0300 2011: > (Without cassert, it looks like LockReassignCurrentOwner is the next > biggest time sink; I'm wondering if there's some sort of O(N^2) behavior > in there.) That seems fishy. Even if there weren't quadratic behavior, should this be called at all? AFAIK it should only be used on cases where there are subtransactions at work, and I don't think pg_dump uses them. -- Álvaro Herrera <alvherre@commandprompt.com> The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc. PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: