Re: BUG #6232: hstore operator ? no longer uses indexes
От | Peter Eisentraut |
---|---|
Тема | Re: BUG #6232: hstore operator ? no longer uses indexes |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 1317266569.18190.0.camel@vanquo.pezone.net обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: BUG #6232: hstore operator ? no longer uses indexes (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: BUG #6232: hstore operator ? no longer uses indexes
|
Список | pgsql-bugs |
On ons, 2011-09-28 at 22:42 -0400, Tom Lane wrote: > "Pierre Ducroquet" <p.psql@pinaraf.info> writes: > > [ the "hstore ? text" operator no longer matches an hstore GIST index ] > > Hmm ... this doesn't seem to be specific to either hstore or GIST; it's > a collation problem. The index is marked as having no collation, which > is reasonable since hstore is a collation-less type. However, the ? > OpExpr gets marked as having "default" collation because it has one > collatable input, namely the text constant. And then, > match_clause_to_indexcol decides the clause doesn't match the index. > > Not sure what to do about this. Is it okay to suppose that collation > can be ignored when matching to a collation-less index? That sounds correct on first reading.
В списке pgsql-bugs по дате отправления: