Re: citext operator precedence fix
От | Alvaro Herrera |
---|---|
Тема | Re: citext operator precedence fix |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 1316714786-sup-8212@alvh.no-ip.org обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: citext operator precedence fix ("David E. Wheeler" <david@kineticode.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: citext operator precedence fix
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Excerpts from David E. Wheeler's message of jue sep 22 14:51:59 -0300 2011: > On Sep 22, 2011, at 10:50 AM, Josh Berkus wrote: > > >> Just write some comparisons like upthread, and see if the output is f or t. Put them into sql/citext.sql. > > > > Oh, ok. I thought you meant checking the actual function call. > > > > Tests go in the main SQL file? Shouldn't they have their own file? > > That is the test file. The main SQL file is citext--1.0.sql. You'll actually need to bump the version number to 1.1, renamethat file to citext--1.1.sql, and also add them to a citext--1.0--1.1.sql. There probably also needs to be a citext--unpackaged--1.1.sqlfile. Hmm, if there's a citext--unpackaged--1.0.sql and also citext--1.0--1.1.sql, is it really necessary to have citext--unpackaged--1.1.sql? Shouldn't the upgrade facility be able to just run both scripts? -- Álvaro Herrera <alvherre@commandprompt.com> The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc. PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: