Re: Is there really no interest in SQL Standard?

On tis, 2011-09-20 at 11:12 -0300, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> > > +1 for a closed mailing list.  It's a bit annoying to have to do
> such
> > > a thing, but it's not like we haven't got other closed lists for
> > > appropriate purposes.
> > 
> > Well, that much we've already decided a few years ago.  The blocking
> > issues are: (1) do we have enough interest, and (2) where to put it
> (I'm
> > looking at you, pgfoundry).
> 
> I don't see why we wouldn't put it in @postgresql.org.

One nice thing about pgfoundry would be the document manager.  Also, at
least at some point in the past, a pgfoundry project was easier to
manage than getting anything done about a @postgresql.org mailing list.