Re: [INTERFACES] transactions in libpq++ require new connection?
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [INTERFACES] transactions in libpq++ require new connection? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 1316.931483258@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | transactions in libpq++ require new connection? (George Young <gry@ll.mit.edu>) |
Список | pgsql-interfaces |
George Young <gry@ll.mit.edu> writes: > Currently, the PgTransaction class only has a public constructor which > opens a new connection to the DB, and closes it on commit. Ugh. I agree that's pretty awful. > I know I can roll my own by just Exec("begin"), etc, but having the > transaction *committed* (not conn closed) in the destructor would be very > handy. > Also, there's no rollback member... Actually, I think the cleanest design would be to have a commit() member function. If the object is destroyed without having committed, the default behavior ought to be to abort (rollback), not commit. The reason I think this is that if you imagine a PgTransaction object that is local to a function, and the function is exited by an exception, you probably want abort to happen rather than commit. There might be some cases where you'd rather it worked the other way around --- if so, we could have a constructor option to set the default behavior at destruct time. But I think defaulting to abort would be the safest behavior for a program that uses exceptions. regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-interfaces по дате отправления: