Re: pg_upgrade automatic testing
От | Peter Eisentraut |
---|---|
Тема | Re: pg_upgrade automatic testing |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 1315255338.8124.12.camel@vanquo.pezone.net обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: pg_upgrade automatic testing (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: pg_upgrade automatic testing
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On lör, 2011-09-03 at 19:58 -0400, Tom Lane wrote: > Anyway, after giving up on that I went back to plan A, namely install > regress.so and friends into $libdir. That turns out to be really quite > straightforward, though I had to hack pg_regress.c a bit to get its idea > of $libdir to match up exactly with the way the backend sees it. > (The only reason this matters is that there's one error report in the > regression tests where the full expansion of $libdir is reported. > Maybe we should just drop that one test case instead of maintaining > the infrastructure for replacing @libdir@ in pg_regress.c.) > > Attached is a draft patch for HEAD. It passes "make check" and "make > installcheck" on Unix, but I've not touched the MSVC scripts. > Comments? I'll try to integrate this with my pg_upgrade test runner to see if it gets the job done.
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: