Re: BUG #17994: Invalidating relcache corrupts tupDesc inside ExecEvalFieldStoreDeForm()
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: BUG #17994: Invalidating relcache corrupts tupDesc inside ExecEvalFieldStoreDeForm() |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 1314841.1687981948@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: BUG #17994: Invalidating relcache corrupts tupDesc inside ExecEvalFieldStoreDeForm() (Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>) |
Ответы |
Re: BUG #17994: Invalidating relcache corrupts tupDesc inside ExecEvalFieldStoreDeForm()
|
Список | pgsql-bugs |
Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> writes: > On 2023-06-28 14:49:34 -0400, Tom Lane wrote: >> That's not sufficient lifespan in the scenario we're dealing >> with here: if the tupdesc gets trashed anytime before the >> eventual ExecEvalFieldStoreForm(), we'll have garbage in the >> result tuple. > What are the scenarios that could lead to the tupledesc being released before > ExecEvalFieldStoreForm()? I guess a function call that does an ALTER TABLE > might do the trick? But shouldn't such cases be prohibited by > CheckTableNotInUse()? Any old cache flush could do it; you don't need a local trigger event. (Alexander's original test case uses CREATE PUBLICATION to trigger the cache flush, but that's just an easy way to make it more-or-less deterministic.) > If other sessions caused the tupledesc to be changed, > we should already hang onto the old definition via the > RememberToFreeTupleDescAtEOX() mechanism? I believe the tupdesc in question is actually in the typcache, which doesn't have anything like RememberToFreeTupleDescAtEOX (which is a horrid hack anyway if you ask me). We could probably make things better for this specific case by teaching the typcache not to replace a cached tupdesc unless its contents actually change. But that just makes it harder to get to a bug instance; it's not a cure-all. regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-bugs по дате отправления: