Re: user defined function
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: user defined function |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 13139.1138224526@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: user defined function (andrew <andrew.ylzhou@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: user defined function
|
Список | pgsql-general |
andrew <andrew.ylzhou@gmail.com> writes: > Sorry, I modified the parser code and forgot abt it. Now there is no > problem in creating the function. But there is another problem. I > create a function to accept record type parameter. But when I call it > on a specific composite type, error is reported. The followings are > what I have done: > backend> create function complete(record) returns int4 as > '$libdir/qualityudf' language C > QUERY: create function complete(record) returns int4 as > '$libdir/qualityudf' language C > backend> select *, complete(Person) from Person > QUERY: select *, complete(Person) from Person > ERROR: Function complete(person) does not exist Hmm. Looking at parse_coerce.c, 8.1 is the first release that thinks named composite types can be coerced to RECORD. I think you may be forced to upgrade if you want this to work. Changing 7.3's coerce_type() to allow this case would be simple enough, but I think you are still going to be minus a lot of infrastructure that's required to make it actually do anything useful :-( regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: