Re: sha1, sha2 functions into core?
| От | Peter Eisentraut |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: sha1, sha2 functions into core? |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 1313046396.5229.3.camel@vanquo.pezone.net обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: sha1, sha2 functions into core? (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
| Ответы |
Re: sha1, sha2 functions into core?
|
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
On ons, 2011-08-10 at 14:19 -0400, Tom Lane wrote: > > One thing that might be reasonable would be to move the digest() > > functions > > digest(data text, type text) returns bytea > > digest(data bytea, type text) returns bytea > > from pgcrypto into core, > > ... which this approach would create, because digest() isn't > restricted > to just those algorithms. I think it'd be better to just invent two > new functions, which also avoids issues for applications that > currently > expect the digest functions to be installed in pgcrypto's schema. I would also prefer to simply add sha1(bytea/text) => bytea, but the existing md5 function is md5(bytea/text) => test, so either the new functions would be inconsistent, or we make the new functions broken like the old one, or we invent a different naming system, such as digest().
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: