Re: Possible Bug in pg_upgrade
От | Peter Eisentraut |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Possible Bug in pg_upgrade |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 1313046149.5229.1.camel@vanquo.pezone.net обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Possible Bug in pg_upgrade (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: Possible Bug in pg_upgrade
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On ons, 2011-08-10 at 18:53 -0400, Tom Lane wrote: > Dave Byrne <dbyrne@mdb.com> writes: > > Attached is a patch that skips orphaned temporary relations in pg_upgrade if they are lingering around. It works for9.0 -> 9.1 upgrades, however I wasn't able to tell when pg_class.relistemp was added so if it was unavailable in versionsprior to 9.0 an additional check will have to be added. > > I'm inclined to think the correct fix is to revert the assumption that > the old and new databases contain exactly the same number of tables ... > that seems to have a lot of potential failure modes besides this one. It's basically checking whether pg_dump -s worked. That doesn't seem like a good use of time.
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: