Re: cataloguing NOT NULL constraints
От | Alvaro Herrera |
---|---|
Тема | Re: cataloguing NOT NULL constraints |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 1312342392-sup-7189@alvh.no-ip.org обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: cataloguing NOT NULL constraints (Dean Rasheed <dean.a.rasheed@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: cataloguing NOT NULL constraints
Re: cataloguing NOT NULL constraints |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Excerpts from Dean Rasheed's message of sáb jul 30 18:40:46 -0400 2011: > Looks pretty good to me (not too dirty). I suppose given that the > parser transforms AT_ColumnConstraint into one of the existing command > subtypes, you could just have gram.y emit an AT_AddConstraint with the > ColumnDef attached, to save adding a new subtype, but there's probably > not much difference. Thanks. I've done the other changes you suggested, but I don't see that it's desirable to have gram.y emit AT_AddConstraint directly. It seems cleaner to be able to turn a NOT NULL constraint into AT_SetNotNull in parse_utilcmd instead. (Maybe I'll have to bite the bullet and make AT_AddConstraint work for not null constraints as well, as part of the larger patch. Not sure.) Currently, the table constraint syntax only lets you do a single constraint at a time, but you can do multiple constraints with the column constraint syntax. I am not sure how hard it is to rework the grammar so that only a single constraint is allowed, but I'm not sure that it's worth the trouble either. Attached is an updated version, touching the docs and adding a new simple regression test. But ... I just noticed that I need to touch ALTER DOMAIN in a similar way as well. -- Álvaro Herrera <alvherre@commandprompt.com> The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc. PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support
Вложения
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: