Re: isolation tests broken for other than 'read committed'
От | Alvaro Herrera |
---|---|
Тема | Re: isolation tests broken for other than 'read committed' |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 1310771286-sup-5729@alvh.no-ip.org обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | isolation tests broken for other than 'read committed' ("Kevin Grittner" <Kevin.Grittner@wicourts.gov>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Excerpts from Kevin Grittner's message of vie jul 15 18:23:10 -0400 2011: > It's been a few days since I've run through my usual builds and > tests, and I just discovered that part of my routine was broken by > this commit: > > http://git.postgresql.org/gitweb/?p=postgresql.git;a=commitdiff;h=846af54dd5a77dc02feeb5e34283608012cfb217 Sorry 'bout that. > The isolation tests are broken when run against a database with > default_transaction_isolation = 'repeatable read' or 'serializable'. > (Which is ironic, really.) > > Adding the attached files to src/test/isolation/expected/ causes > those stricter isolation levels to work in my tests so far, but I > get random failures in 'read committed' due to apparent randomness > in which process is chosen as the deadlock victim. I seem to > remember Noah mentioning this and a suggested fix, but the problem > in manifest in a current checkout of head. Yeah, the patch I committed from Noah should fix the issues in read committed. It hadn't crossed my mind that I need to manually set the level to serializable in order for the tests to be meaningful :-( Shouldn't we be running the tests three times with the different useful isolation levels? > Of course, another approach to this would be to set transaction > isolation level in the new tests. If we do that, we might want to > create tests at all three levels, for completeness. I think your approach of adding alternative expected outputs makes more sense. -- Álvaro Herrera <alvherre@commandprompt.com> The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc. PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: