Re: Feedback about Drupal SQL debugging
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Feedback about Drupal SQL debugging |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 13107.1250899627@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Feedback about Drupal SQL debugging (Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>) |
Ответы |
Re: Feedback about Drupal SQL debugging
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net> writes: > Jean-Michel Pour� wrote: >> Why can't PostgreSQL add the required field automatically? Could this be >> added to PostgreSQL to-do-list? > Isn't that contrary to the standard? As of SQL99 it's supposed to be legal if you're grouping by a primary key (or some other cases where the other columns can be proved functionally dependent on the grouping columns, but that's the most useful one). We haven't got round to implementing that, but I'm not sure that it would make the Drupal code work anyway. Are they actually writing to spec here, or just doing whatever mysql will let them? BTW, I was under the impression there already *was* a TODO entry about improving our standards compliance in this area. I can't find it in the list right now, though. regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: