Re: pgsql: Fix assorted inconsistencies in GIN opclass support function dec
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: pgsql: Fix assorted inconsistencies in GIN opclass support function dec |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 13088.1462223388@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: pgsql: Fix assorted inconsistencies in GIN opclass support function dec (Alexander Korotkov <a.korotkov@postgrespro.ru>) |
Ответы |
Re: pgsql: Fix assorted inconsistencies in GIN opclass
support function dec
Re: pgsql: Fix assorted inconsistencies in GIN opclass support function dec Re: pgsql: Fix assorted inconsistencies in GIN opclass support function dec |
Список | pgsql-committers |
Alexander Korotkov <a.korotkov@postgrespro.ru> writes: > On Wed, Jan 20, 2016 at 6:32 AM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: >> contrib/hstore/hstore--1.3.sql | 12 ++++----- >> contrib/intarray/intarray--1.1.sql | 8 +++--- >> contrib/tsearch2/tsearch2--1.0.sql | 4 +-- > Hmm... Is it correct to change function signatures without extension > version bump? pg_upgraded clusters would remain with old version of these > functions. Once we have instances with same extension version but with > different signatures of its functions, there is no correct way to refer > these functions in future. I think we should do the version bump in this > case. It doesn't really matter, though, because there simply isn't any need to refer to these functions from SQL. They are only useful as opclass support functions. But this is likely moot anyway, because of the need to bump all the contrib modules' versions in order to install parallel-safety labels on their functions. (I wonder why that isn't on the open-items list.) regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-committers по дате отправления: