Re: SYNONYMS (again)
От | Alvaro Herrera |
---|---|
Тема | Re: SYNONYMS (again) |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 1308783023-sup-9215@alvh.no-ip.org обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | SYNONYMS (again) ("Joshua D. Drake" <jd@commandprompt.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: SYNONYMS (again)
Re: SYNONYMS (again) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Excerpts from Joshua D. Drake's message of mié jun 22 15:37:17 -0400 2011: > Per: > > http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2010-11/msg02043.php > > It seems we did come up with a use case in the procpid discussion. The > ability to change the names of columns/databases etc, to handle the > fixing of bad decision decisions during development over time. > > Thoughts? Let's start with what was discussed and supported in that thread, that is, databases. It seems less clear that columns are widely believed to be a good idea to have synonyms for. Besides, synonyms for databases should be reasonably simple to implement, which is not something I would say for columns. -- Álvaro Herrera <alvherre@commandprompt.com> The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc. PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: