Re: possible connection leak in dblink?

On ons, 2011-06-15 at 11:41 +0900, Fujii Masao wrote:
> ISTM that the root problem is that dblink_send_query calls DBLINK_GET_CONN
> though it doesn't accept the connection string as an argument. Since the first
> argument in dblink_send_query must be the connection name, dblink_send_query
> should call DBLINK_GET_NAMED_CONN instead. The variable 'freeconn' is used
> only when DBLINK_GET_CONN is called. So, if dblink_send_query uses
> DBLINK_GET_NAMED_CONN instead, the variable 'freeconn' is no longer necessary.
> 
> The similar problem exists in dblink_get_result and dblink_record_internal.
> Attached patch fixes those problems.

Is this a bug fix that should be backpatched?