Re: FK NOT VALID can't be deferrable?
От | Alvaro Herrera |
---|---|
Тема | Re: FK NOT VALID can't be deferrable? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 1308168833-sup-3188@alvh.no-ip.org обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: FK NOT VALID can't be deferrable? (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: FK NOT VALID can't be deferrable?
Re: FK NOT VALID can't be deferrable? Re: FK NOT VALID can't be deferrable? |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Excerpts from Tom Lane's message of mié jun 15 11:54:25 -0400 2011: > Dean Rasheed <dean.a.rasheed@gmail.com> writes: > > On 15 June 2011 07:56, Jaime Casanova <jaime@2ndquadrant.com> wrote: > >> Testing the CHECK NOT VALID patch i found $subject... is this intended? > > > Aside from the ugliness of the code, we can't just add a > > ConstraintAttributeSpec to the second block, because that would > > enforce an order to these options. > > > OTOH adding NOT VALID to ConstraintAttributeSpec is a bit invasive, > > since it's used in quite a few places, including CREATE TABLE, where > > NOT VALID is never allowed. > > I think we need to do the second one, ie, add it to > ConstraintAttributeSpec and do what's necessary to filter later. > The reason we have a problem here is exactly that somebody took > shortcuts. > > It'd probably be sufficient to have one or two places in > parse_utilcmds.c know which variants of Constraint actually support > NOT VALID, and throw an error for the rest. So is somebody from 2nd Quadrant going to supply a patch to fix this? -- Álvaro Herrera <alvherre@commandprompt.com> The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc. PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: