Re: Postmaster holding unlinked files for pg_largeobject table
От | Alvaro Herrera |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Postmaster holding unlinked files for pg_largeobject table |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 1307649664-sup-6207@alvh.no-ip.org обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Postmaster holding unlinked files for pg_largeobject table (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: Postmaster holding unlinked files for pg_largeobject table
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Excerpts from Tom Lane's message of jue jun 09 14:45:31 -0400 2011: > Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@commandprompt.com> writes: > > Excerpts from Tom Lane's message of mié jun 08 14:28:02 -0400 2011: > >> Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@commandprompt.com> writes: > >>> This customer is running on 8.4 so I started from there; should I > >>> backpatch this to 8.2, or not at all? > > >> I'm not excited about back-patching it... > > > Bummer. > > Well, of course mine is only one opinion; anybody else feel this *is* > worth risking a back-patch for? > > My thought is that it needs some beta testing. Perhaps it'd be sane to > push it into beta2 now, and then back-patch sometime after 9.1 final, > if no problems pop up. FWIW I was about to push it but noticed that regression tests fail with this: TRAP: FailedAssertion("!(!ReindexIsProcessingIndex(((indexRelation)->rd_id)))", File: "/pgsql/source/HEAD/src/backend/access/index/indexam.c",Line: 283) I just make distclean'd -- still there. I'm gonna revert my patch and retry. -- Álvaro Herrera <alvherre@commandprompt.com> The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc. PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: