Re: [lockhart@alumni.caltech.edu: Third call for platform testing]
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [lockhart@alumni.caltech.edu: Third call for platform testing] |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 13065.986426433@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [lockhart@alumni.caltech.edu: Third call for platform testing] (Thomas Lockhart <lockhart@alumni.caltech.edu>) |
Ответы |
Re: [lockhart@alumni.caltech.edu: Third call for platform testing]
re: [lockhart@alumni.caltech.edu: Third call for platform testing] re: [lockhart@alumni.caltech.edu: Third call for platform testing] |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Thomas Lockhart <lockhart@alumni.caltech.edu> writes: > Anyone have suggestions for Mathew? >> for postgresql-7.1RC2.tar.gz, here is my `make check' for NetBSD/sparc64: >> digging into the regression.diffs, i can see that: >> - reltime failed because it just had: >> ! psql: Backend startup failed The postmaster log file should have more info, but a first thought is that you ran up against process or swap-space limitations. The parallel check has fifty-odd processes going at its peak, which is more than the default per-user process limit on many Unixen. >> - inherit fails because the ordering is invalid, eg: Ordering issues are not really bugs (cf documentation about interpreting regression results), although it'd be interesting to know if these diffs still occur after you resolve the other failures. >> - create_index failed because of some weird error that may >> have more to do with the quick-n-dirty installation i have >> on the SS20 i'm doing the test on: >> >> CREATE INDEX hash_i4_index ON hash_i4_heap USING hash (random int4_ops); >> + ERROR: cannot read block 3 of hash_i4_index: Bad address "Bad address"? That seems pretty bizarre. >> i will be reinstalling this SS20 with a full installation sometime in >> the next few days. i will re-run the testsuite after this to see if >> that is causing any of the lossage. Please let us know. regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: