Re: should pg_basebackup be listed as a server application?
От | Alvaro Herrera |
---|---|
Тема | Re: should pg_basebackup be listed as a server application? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 1304706536-sup-3669@alvh.no-ip.org обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: should pg_basebackup be listed as a server application? (Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net>) |
Ответы |
Re: should pg_basebackup be listed as a server application?
|
Список | pgsql-docs |
Excerpts from Magnus Hagander's message of vie may 06 14:30:27 -0300 2011: > On Fri, May 6, 2011 at 19:18, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net> wrote: > > The pg_basebackup reference page is currently under "Client > > Applications" [0]. I think it's more of a server application, because > > it's what you'd run instead of initdb on the server. Should it be moved > > to the "Server Applications" section? > > Not sure I buy that argument. pg_dump/pg_dumpall/pg_restore are under > client applications. They're something you run *alongside* initdb and > not instead, sure.. But they're all backup tools. Is there really a dichotomy here? Client/server? Maybe we just need another category, "administrative applications" or something like that. -- Álvaro Herrera <alvherre@commandprompt.com> The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc. PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support
В списке pgsql-docs по дате отправления: