Re: Building PDFs error: \pdfendlink ended up in different nesting level than \pd
От | Alvaro Herrera |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Building PDFs error: \pdfendlink ended up in different nesting level than \pd |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 1303831979-sup-5180@alvh.no-ip.org обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Building PDFs error: \pdfendlink ended up in different nesting level than \pd (Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: Building PDFs error: \pdfendlink ended up in
different nesting level than \pd
|
Список | pgsql-docs |
Excerpts from Bruce Momjian's message of mar abr 26 12:15:50 -0300 2011: > Tom Lane wrote: > > Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net> writes: > > > On lr, 2011-03-12 at 09:13 -0500, Bruce Momjian wrote: > > >> OK, it is not something worthwhile, or just something you don't have > > >> time for. If the later, can you give us a hint on how to fix it? > > > > > I'm not even sure what the actual action item is supposed to be. > > > > The last suggestion in the thread was to move the contrib docs up one > > level in the hierarchy, ie each contrib module would get a chapter not a > > sect1. > > I think we would have to move "Additional Supplied Modules" up into its > own book, and then list each module. The problem is that there are 42 > modules so that list is going to be pretty long in the table of > contents. Also, most of the sections are pretty short. Making each of them a chapter seems a waste. I think some of them deserve a full chapter (dblink, citext?, hstore, intarray, ltree, pgbench, pgcrypto, pgtrgm?, pg_upgrade, tablefunc), but most don't. (Some of the others could, perhaps, get moved under "Reference"). Would it work to move only some? -- Álvaro Herrera <alvherre@commandprompt.com> The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc. PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support
В списке pgsql-docs по дате отправления: