Re: Alternative to serial primary key
От | David Clarke |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Alternative to serial primary key |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 12b7ac1e0607070037p4c2a94d4r8e6758be7b08ca95@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Alternative to serial primary key ("D'Arcy J.M. Cain" <darcy@druid.net>) |
Ответы |
Re: Alternative to serial primary key
|
Список | pgsql-sql |
On 7/7/06, D'Arcy J.M. Cain <darcy@druid.net> wrote: > Are you sure? I have a hard time imagining a situation where that Absolutely. > Also, you need to get into a lot more coding to handle the fact that > "521 Main Avenue" is the same address as "521 Main Av." and "521 Main > Ave" and even "521 Main." Actually that is being done for me and you're correct, it is a lot of effort but there are a variety of services out there and I'm not trying to reinvent the wheel. > And even given all of that, I would probably still use serial. Because? > Danger, Will Robinson. The phrase "regenerate my primary key" > immediately raises the hairs on the back of my neck. If the primary > key can ever change, you have a broken schema. Perhaps my choice of words was somewhat hasty. A serial is totally divorced from the data it represents whereas a md5 hash is (for my purposes) unique, stable, verifiable, and simple. Dave
В списке pgsql-sql по дате отправления: