Re: Replication options?
От | Andrew Rawnsley |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Replication options? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 129A3623-EC15-11D8-84DB-000393A47FCC@ravensfield.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Replication options? (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Список | pgsql-general |
On Aug 11, 2004, at 12:02 PM, Tom Lane wrote: > Jeff Eckermann <jeff_eckermann@yahoo.com> writes: >> That probably won't impress your bosses. If you need >> a track record, then erServer might be what you need. >> erServer is a commercially produced product that was >> (is still?) used by Afilias, the provider of registry >> services for the .info and .org domains. That's >> serious testing; very large databases and lots of >> traffic. > >> Note that Afilias paid for the development of Slony-I; > > ... because they were quite unhappy with erServer ... > > Now erServer did work for them, but it required significant amounts of > tuning and constant babysitting by the DBA. (If Andrew Sullivan is > paying attention to this thread, he can offer lots of gory details.) > I can also personally testify that getting erServer set up is a major > pain in the rear. I haven't messed with Slony, but all reports are > that > it's a substantially better piece of code. > > regards, tom lane > > ---------------------------(end of > broadcast)--------------------------- > TIP 7: don't forget to increase your free space map settings > As the last person to do any significant work on the eRServer code (at least the open-source version), I would have to agree that Slony is the direction to take looking forward. I would like to think we managed to fix a lot of problems, and improved the usability of it quite a bit, but Andrew Sullivan and I agreed that its a dead end - there will be a final packaging of what's in CVS and that will be it, unless someone else wants to pick it up. -------------------- Andrew Rawnsley President The Ravensfield Digital Resource Group, Ltd. (740) 587-0114 www.ravensfield.com
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: