Re: Mark deprecated operators as such in their comments?
От | Alvaro Herrera |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Mark deprecated operators as such in their comments? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 1299516143-sup-9390@alvh.no-ip.org обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Mark deprecated operators as such in their comments? (Greg Stark <gsstark@mit.edu>) |
Ответы |
Re: Mark deprecated operators as such in their comments?
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Excerpts from Greg Stark's message of jue mar 03 13:02:53 -0300 2011: > But I'm not sure it's worth bothering. Filling in the description > field is hardly the most annoying part of adding pg_proc entries for > operators. If we could move most or all of the entries to an SQL file > so that we didn't have to deal with commutator and negator oids and > all that, that would save a lot of pain. You seem to want to have a completely new way to describe contents of pg_proc.h and pg_operator.h, from which the DATA and DESCR lines could be generated. Perhaps that's a worthy goal, not sure. I'm not sure it can be done with SQL though. -- Álvaro Herrera <alvherre@commandprompt.com> The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc. PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: