Re: Could postgres be much cleaner if a future release skipped backward compatibility?
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Could postgres be much cleaner if a future release skipped backward compatibility? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 12991.1255992303@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Could postgres be much cleaner if a future release skipped backward compatibility? (Ron Mayer <rm_pg@cheapcomplexdevices.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Could postgres be much cleaner if a future release
skipped backward compatibility?
Re: Could postgres be much cleaner if a future release skipped backward compatibility? Re: Could postgres be much cleaner if a future release skipped backward compatibility? Re: Could postgres be much cleaner if a future release skipped backward compatibility? |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Ron Mayer <rm_pg@cheapcomplexdevices.com> writes: > Would postgres get considerably cleaner if a hypothetical 9.0 release > skipped backward compatibility and removed anything that's only > maintained for historical reasons? Yeah, and our user community would get a lot smaller too :-( Actually, I think any attempt to do that would result in a fork, and a consequent splintering of the community. We can get away with occasionally cleaning up individual problematic behaviors (example: implicit casts to text), but any sort of all-at-once breakage would result in a lot of people Just Saying No. regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: