Re: porting question: funky uid names?
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: porting question: funky uid names? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 12989.984188976@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: porting question: funky uid names? (Mark Bixby <mark@bixby.org>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Mark Bixby <mark@bixby.org> writes: > Is it possible to re-run failing regression tests individually? I believe so, but it's not very convenient in the "runcheck" mode, since that normally wants to make a fresh install and start a temporary postmaster. Instead, do a real install, start a real postmaster, and do "make runtest" to create the regression DB in the real installation. Then you can basically just do "psql regression <foo.sql" --- look at the regression driver script to get the details of what switches to pass and how to do the output comparison. There are some order dependencies among the tests, but I think all the ones you were having trouble with should be able to work this way in an end-state regression DB. Also, rerunning the whole suite is much quicker this way, since you don't have to go through install/initdb/start postmaster each time. BTW, the results you posted looked good --- with the exception of plpgsql, the failing tests all seemed to be ones that are notorious for platform-dependent output. regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: