Re: Should partial dumps include extensions?
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Should partial dumps include extensions? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 12961.1306416491@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Should partial dumps include extensions? (Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net> writes: > On tis, 2011-05-24 at 23:26 -0400, Robert Haas wrote: >> On Tue, May 24, 2011 at 4:44 PM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: >>> There's a complaint here >>> http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-general/2011-05/msg00714.php >>> about the fact that 9.1 pg_dump always dumps CREATE EXTENSION commands >>> for all loaded extensions. Should we change that? A reasonable >>> compromise might be to suppress extensions in the same cases where we >>> suppress procedural languages, ie if --schema or --table was used >>> (see "include_everything" switch in pg_dump.c). >> Making it work like procedural languages seems sensible to me. > The same problem still exists for foreign data wrappers, servers, and > user mappings. It should probably be changed in the same way. No objection here, but I'm not going to go do it ... regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: