Re: BUG #15350: Getting invalid cache ID: 11 Errors
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: BUG #15350: Getting invalid cache ID: 11 Errors |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 12945.1535123753@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | BUG #15350: Getting invalid cache ID: 11 Errors (PG Bug reporting form <noreply@postgresql.org>) |
Ответы |
Re: BUG #15350: Getting invalid cache ID: 11 Errors
|
Список | pgsql-bugs |
=?utf-8?q?PG_Bug_reporting_form?= <noreply@postgresql.org> writes: > We're using 10.5 with parallel queries enabled and the config options > #max_worker_processes = 8 > #max_parallel_workers_per_gather = 2 > #max_parallel_workers = 8 > I'm seeing invalid cache ID: 11 errors in the log. It's only happening > occasionally (15 times today on a not very busy system). Interesting. Syscache 11 would be AUTHOID, which seems to be consulted mostly for privilege checks, though there's at least one reference during process startup. > I've been following > the thread about making windowing functions et al parallel restricted - Is > this another manifestation of the problem? No, I don't think it's that. We've seen a couple of reports of similar failures referencing cache 42, but this is a new symptom. > I also don't see how to create a test case sorry. Don't suppose you'd be prepared to recompile PG to turn that ERROR into a PANIC, and then capture a stack trace from the core dump next time it happens? regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-bugs по дате отправления: