Re: "writable CTEs"
От | Peter Eisentraut |
---|---|
Тема | Re: "writable CTEs" |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 1293486434.11075.9.camel@vanquo.pezone.net обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: "writable CTEs" (Marko Tiikkaja <marko.tiikkaja@cs.helsinki.fi>) |
Ответы |
Re: "writable CTEs"
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On ons, 2010-12-22 at 20:44 +0200, Marko Tiikkaja wrote: > On 2010-12-22 8:28 PM, Peter Eisentraut wrote: > > As a side note, I think the term "writable CTE" is a misnomer. The CTE > > is not writable. The CTE is the result of a write operation. > > > > A writable CTE would look like this: > > > > WITH foo AS (SELECT ...) UPDATE foo SET ... > > > > a bit like an updatable view. > > > > AFAICT, the current patch doesn't use the term, so there is no problem, > > but just for those who are preparing propaganda and such. > > I think I've used "DML WITH" in the patch, but I don't like that either. > Naming this feature seems to be quite a challenge. *Writing* CTEs is more accurate.
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: