Re: C++ keywords in headers (was Re: [GENERAL] #include
)
| От | Peter Eisentraut |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: C++ keywords in headers (was Re: [GENERAL] #include
|
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 1293465256.11075.1.camel@vanquo.pezone.net обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на |
C++ keywords in headers (was Re: [GENERAL] #include |
| Ответы |
Re: C++ keywords in headers (was Re: [GENERAL] #include Re: C++ keywords in headers (was Re: [GENERAL] #include |
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
On sön, 2010-12-26 at 12:31 -0500, Tom Lane wrote: > We did clean up C++ keyword uses in the header files in 9.0, but your > report shows it's already gotten broken again. I'm disinclined to fix > it unless someone steps up to create an automated test that will get > run reasonably often. We had that discussion when the patch to rename > keyword-named fields was proposed, and nothing got done, and the > current state of affairs is the entirely predictable result. src/tools/pginclude/cpluspluscheck What's missing is to automate this, but it's unclear in what context, and perhaps also to what extend this should be a hard requirement.
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: