Re: index corruption on composite primary key indexes
От | Alvaro Herrera |
---|---|
Тема | Re: index corruption on composite primary key indexes |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 1292510876-sup-5298@alvh.no-ip.org обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: index corruption on composite primary key indexes ("Ng, Stan" <sng@automotive.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: index corruption on composite primary key indexes
|
Список | pgsql-bugs |
Excerpts from Ng, Stan's message of mié dic 15 21:07:57 -0300 2010: > Now I just need to get my head wrapped around the corner cases of MVCC > + indexes. From a layman's perspective, it seems the index should only > operate on the latest version. Perhaps there's a pgsql configuration > option or hint on the index that I'm missing... The hunt continues! All tuples need to have index pointers, even the dead ones. They (the index pointers to dead tuples) are also cleaned up by vacuum. There's an optimization called HOT that allow them to be skipped in some cases; you may want to read http://git.postgresql.org/gitweb?p=postgresql.git;a=blob;f=src/backend/access/heap/README.HOT -- Ãlvaro Herrera <alvherre@commandprompt.com> The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc. PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support
В списке pgsql-bugs по дате отправления: