Re: horizontal partition
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: horizontal partition |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 12896.1107413728@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: horizontal partition (Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: horizontal partition
|
Список | pgsql-performance |
Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com> writes: > The issue here is that the planner is capable of "pushing down" the WHERE > criteria into the first view, but not into the second, "nested" view, and so > postgres materializes the UNIONed data set before perfoming the join. > Thing is, I seem to recall that this particular issue was something Tom fixed > a while ago. Which is why I wanted to know what version Gaetano is using. It's still true that we can't generate a nestloop-with-inner-indexscan join plan if the inner side is anything more complex than a single table scan. Since that's the only plan that gives you any chance of not scanning the whole partitioned table, it's rather a hindrance :-( It might be possible to fix this by treating the nestloop's join conditions as "push down-able" criteria, instead of the present rather ad hoc method for generating nestloop/indexscan plans. It'd be quite a deal of work though, and I'm concerned about how slow the planner might run if we did do it like that. regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-performance по дате отправления: