Re: Weird quirk with pg_dump of complex types
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Weird quirk with pg_dump of complex types |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 12893.1235715890@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Weird quirk with pg_dump of complex types (Jeff Davis <pgsql@j-davis.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Weird quirk with pg_dump of complex types
|
Список | pgsql-bugs |
Jeff Davis <pgsql@j-davis.com> writes: > It seems like pg_dump tries fairly hard to make the output readable in > the typical case. It does seem a little inconsistent that the list of > types that make up another type don't follow the exact same rules; Are you entirely sure that they don't? Josh didn't provide enough context to be sure, but I didn't see any clear proof in his example that the type references were working any differently than they do elsewhere in pg_dump. The normal deal in pg_dump is that when dumping any given object, the search path is set to that object's schema followed by pg_catalog. So you will get a schema qualification for any reference to an object in a different schema. Also, there are certain standard data types that are spelled in special ways because The SQL Standard Says So. regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-bugs по дате отправления: