Re: INSERT ... VALUES... with ORDER BY / LIMIT
От | Jeff Davis |
---|---|
Тема | Re: INSERT ... VALUES... with ORDER BY / LIMIT |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 1285959229.28506.21.camel@jdavis-ux.asterdata.local обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | INSERT ... VALUES... with ORDER BY / LIMIT (Hitoshi Harada <umi.tanuki@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: INSERT ... VALUES... with ORDER BY / LIMIT
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, 2010-10-01 at 18:52 +0900, Hitoshi Harada wrote: > While tackling the top-level CTEs patch, I found that INSERT ... > VALUES isn't aware of ORDER BY / LIMIT. > > regression=# CREATE TABLE t1(x int); > CREATE TABLE > regression=# INSERT INTO t1 VALUES (1),(2),(3) LIMIT 1; > INSERT 0 3 That looks like a bug to me. According to the documentation: "Within larger commands, VALUES is syntactically allowed anywhere that SELECT is. Because it is treated like a SELECT bythe grammar, it is possible to use the ORDER BY, LIMIT..." -- http://www.postgresql.org/docs/9.0/static/sql-values.html The doc for INSERT is a little less clear: http://www.postgresql.org/docs/9.0/static/sql-insert.html It explicitly makes room in the INSERT grammar for VALUES, but in that branch of the grammar it doesn't make room for the ORDER BY, etc. Regards,Jeff Davis
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: