Re: I: About "Our CLUSTER implementation is pessimal" patch

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Alvaro Herrera
Тема Re: I: About "Our CLUSTER implementation is pessimal" patch
Дата
Msg-id 1285733907-sup-8868@alvh.no-ip.org
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: I: About "Our CLUSTER implementation is pessimal" patch  (Josh Kupershmidt <schmiddy@gmail.com>)
Ответы Re: I: About "Our CLUSTER implementation is pessimal" patch  (Itagaki Takahiro <itagaki.takahiro@gmail.com>)
Список pgsql-hackers
Excerpts from Josh Kupershmidt's message of mar sep 28 23:53:33 -0400 2010:

> I started looking at the performance impact of this patch based on
> Leonardo's SQL file. On the 2 million row table, I see a consistent
> ~10% advantage for the sequential scan clusters. I'm going to try to
> run the bigger tests a few times and post results from there when I
> get a chance.

10% is nothing.  I was expecting this patch would give an order of
magnitude of improvement or somethine like that in the worst cases of
the current code (highly unsorted input)

-- 
Álvaro Herrera <alvherre@commandprompt.com>
The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc.
PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support


В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Josh Kupershmidt
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: I: About "Our CLUSTER implementation is pessimal" patch
Следующее
От: Pavel Stehule
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Proposal: plpgsql - "for in array" statement