Re: BUG #5669: server process was terminated by exception 0xC0000005
От | Alvaro Herrera |
---|---|
Тема | Re: BUG #5669: server process was terminated by exception 0xC0000005 |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 1285177595-sup-6709@alvh.no-ip.org обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: BUG #5669: server process was terminated by exception 0xC0000005 (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: BUG #5669: server process was terminated by exception 0xC0000005
|
Список | pgsql-bugs |
Excerpts from Tom Lane's message of mié sep 22 13:36:18 -0400 2010: > Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@commandprompt.com> writes: > > Excerpts from Tom Lane's message of mié sep 22 13:03:06 -0400 2010: > >> Wouldn't an empty string be acceptable? SQL doesn't allow zero-length > >> identifiers, so this couldn't be confused with any really-valid value. > > > I dunno really -- what is this value used for, anyway? If it's just to be > > able to generate the SHOW table which is then parsed to obtain the > > fulltext configuration, seems OK. > > Well, the more general point is what should "SHOW session_authorization" > show in an autovacuum process? The fact that Andrew wasn't > intentionally doing that doesn't mean that someone else might not try > it. I think we can either decide it should be an obviously-illegal > value, or try to make it return the name of the cluster-creating > superuser. The latter seems like more work than it's worth though. +1 for the illegal value. -- Ãlvaro Herrera <alvherre@commandprompt.com> The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc. PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support
В списке pgsql-bugs по дате отправления: