Re: [HACKERS] Re: Max backend limits cleaned up
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [HACKERS] Re: Max backend limits cleaned up |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 1285.919622627@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [HACKERS] Re: Max backend limits cleaned up (Bruce Momjian <maillist@candle.pha.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: [HACKERS] Re: Max backend limits cleaned up
Re: [HACKERS] Re: Max backend limits cleaned up Re: [HACKERS] Re: Max backend limits cleaned up |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Bruce Momjian <maillist@candle.pha.pa.us> writes: >> 5. Allocation of semaphores and shared memory is now based on >> -N switch value (default or specified) rather than the MAXBACKENDS >> constant. > sgml and man documenation updates, right? Or should I do it? I put something into the docs last night in the places where configure and postmaster switches are described. I am thinking, though, that we also ought to have FAQ entries under headings like: I get "IpcSemaphoreCreate: semget failed (No space left on device)"when I try to start the postmaster I get 'Sorry, too many clients already' when trying to connect If you like, I'll try to write up a first cut at these. regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: