Re: Serializable Snapshot Isolation
От | Alvaro Herrera |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Serializable Snapshot Isolation |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 1284677615-sup-2005@alvh.no-ip.org обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Serializable Snapshot Isolation ("Kevin Grittner" <Kevin.Grittner@wicourts.gov>) |
Ответы |
Re: Serializable Snapshot Isolation
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Excerpts from Kevin Grittner's message of mié sep 15 14:52:36 -0400 2010: > Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@commandprompt.com> wrote: > > > I think that would also solve a concern that I had, which is that > > we were starting to include relcache.h (and perhaps other headers > > as well, but that's the one that triggered it for me) a bit too > > liberally, so +1 from me. > > Unfortunately, what I proposed doesn't solve that for relcache.h, > although it does eliminate lock.h from almost everywhere and htup.h > from everywhere. Now that I look at your new patch, I noticed that I was actually confusing relcache.h with rel.h. The latter includes a big chunk of our headers, but relcache.h is pretty thin. Including relcache.h in another header is not much of a problem. -- Álvaro Herrera <alvherre@commandprompt.com> The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc. PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: