Re: On non-Windows, hard depend on uselocale(3)
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: On non-Windows, hard depend on uselocale(3) |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 12842.1700083028@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: On non-Windows, hard depend on uselocale(3) (Thomas Munro <thomas.munro@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: On non-Windows, hard depend on uselocale(3)
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Thomas Munro <thomas.munro@gmail.com> writes: > Currently pg_locale.c requires systems to have *either* uselocale() or > mbstowcs_l()/wcstombs_l(), but NetBSD satisfies the second > requirement. Check. > The other uses of uselocale() are in ECPG code that must > be falling back to the setlocale() path. In other words, isn't it the > case that we don't require uselocale() to compile ECPG stuff, but it'll > probably crash or corrupt itself or give wrong answers if you push it > on NetBSD, so... uhh, really we do require it? Dunno. mamba is getting through the ecpg regression tests okay, but we all know that doesn't prove a lot. (AFAICS, ecpg only cares about this to the extent of not wanting an LC_NUMERIC locale where the decimal point isn't '.'. I'm not sure that NetBSD supports any such locale anyway --- I think they're like OpenBSD in having only pro-forma locale support.) regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: