Re: function_name.parameter_name
От | Alvaro Herrera |
---|---|
Тема | Re: function_name.parameter_name |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 1283985160-sup-8720@alvh.no-ip.org обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: function_name.parameter_name (Darren Duncan <darren@darrenduncan.net>) |
Ответы |
Re: function_name.parameter_name
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Excerpts from Darren Duncan's message of mié sep 08 18:29:35 -0400 2010: > Personally I like the idea of developers not always having to be forced to > choose among two equally good names, and making a wrapper function would be > overkill for this feature. While I don't agree with the idea of providing extra names that are probably mostly going to increase the confusion of someone trying to understand such a system, I think this use case would be well covered by synonyms. But these would be defined by a new SQL command, say CREATE SYNONYM, not by funny notation on the initial CREATE FUNCTION call. -- Álvaro Herrera <alvherre@commandprompt.com> The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc. PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: