Re: Regression tests versus the buildfarm environment
От | Peter Eisentraut |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Regression tests versus the buildfarm environment |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 1281550347.26522.13.camel@vanquo.pezone.net обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Regression tests versus the buildfarm environment (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: Regression tests versus the buildfarm environment
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On ons, 2010-08-11 at 11:47 -0400, Tom Lane wrote: > Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net> writes: > > On ons, 2010-08-11 at 10:15 -0400, Tom Lane wrote: > >> How about just this: > >> port = 0xC000 | (DEF_PGPORT & 0x3FFF); > > > The version number was put in there intentionally, for developers who > > work on multiple branches at once. That's the whole reason this code > > exists. Please don't remove it. > > I work on multiple branches all day every day. This wouldn't hinder > me in the slightest, because I use a different DEF_PGPORT for each > branch. If you don't, it's hard to see how you manage to deal with > multiple branches on one machine ... do you not ever actually install > them? No, not nearly as much as I run "make check". > Even if you don't, changing this would only mean that you > couldn't safely run "make check" concurrently in multiple branches. That's exactly the point. The original discussion is here: http://archives.postgresql.org/message-id/491D9935.9010200@gmx.net
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: