Re: 9442-92C3-C7E6 : CONSULT from pgsql-announce (post)
От | Joshua D. Drake |
---|---|
Тема | Re: 9442-92C3-C7E6 : CONSULT from pgsql-announce (post) |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 1280784323.16244.68.camel@jd-desktop.unknown.charter.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: 9442-92C3-C7E6 : CONSULT from pgsql-announce (post) (David Fetter <david@fetter.org>) |
Ответы |
Re: 9442-92C3-C7E6 : CONSULT from pgsql-announce (post)
|
Список | pgsql-www |
On Mon, 2010-08-02 at 14:20 -0700, David Fetter wrote: > That sounds like an excellent idea! > What are your criteria for success in this endeavor, and what are the > criteria for taking more decisive action? People in our community > have been "talking to" these folks for a lot of years, thus far > without effect, so I'm curious what makes you think this time will be > different, and more specifically, when you will decide that "talking > to" them is insufficient. When there is obvious intent to defraud our community in some way. Ignorance, being busy and making mistakes doesn't imply that in any way. > > We need clear criteria here. Will one more list spam do it? Ten? A > thousand? Their track record makes it seem likely that they'll cross > each of those thresholds sooner rather than later. Well honestly, I don't really care about the announce spam. I know where these guys are coming from and I feel for them. -announce is one address our of likely a hundred thousand they are sending. If they have a legacy database, or are using a service (which they are) it could be very easy to have multiple points of failure. > > Or are we going to sell spamming licenses? That seems to be the > alternative. What are they going to cost the first time? The tenth? > How long will they be good for, and do we hit people up for automated > subscriptions? I'm really curious as to how we're going to set this > up. Well to me we are solving a non-existent problem. It may be a problem in the future but again, they aren't subscribing to lists and posting. They send an email to our moderated announce list. It got rejected. They aren't sending twenty a day or even one a day. hitting ctrl-r, typing reject just doesn't take that much bandwidth. Sincerely, Joshua D. Drake -- PostgreSQL.org Major Contributor Command Prompt, Inc: http://www.commandprompt.com/ - 509.416.6579 Consulting, Training, Support, Custom Development, Engineering http://twitter.com/cmdpromptinc | http://identi.ca/commandprompt
В списке pgsql-www по дате отправления: