Re: Keepalive for max_standby_delay
От | Simon Riggs |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Keepalive for max_standby_delay |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 1277709468.25074.63629.camel@ebony обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Keepalive for max_standby_delay (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: Keepalive for max_standby_delay
Re: Keepalive for max_standby_delay |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, 2010-06-16 at 21:56 -0400, Tom Lane wrote: > Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> writes: > > On Wed, Jun 9, 2010 at 8:01 PM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > >> Yes, I'll get with it ... > > > Any update on this? > > Sorry, I've been a bit distracted by other responsibilities (libtiff > security issues for Red Hat, if you must know). I'll get on it shortly. I don't think the PostgreSQL project should wait any longer on this. If it does we risk loss of quality in final release, assuming no slippage. >From here, I will rework my patch of 31 May to * use arrival time on standby as base for max_standby_delay * make delay apply to both streaming and file cases * min_standby_grace_period - min grace on every query, default 0 Decision time, so thoughts please? -- Simon Riggs www.2ndQuadrant.com
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: