Re: Why are these modules built without respecting my LDFLAGS?
От | Peter Eisentraut |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Why are these modules built without respecting my LDFLAGS? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 1277701404.28109.0.camel@vanquo.pezone.net обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Why are these modules built without respecting my LDFLAGS? (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: Why are these modules built without respecting my LDFLAGS?
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On sön, 2010-06-27 at 19:41 -0400, Tom Lane wrote: > OK, so after some digging I find that, while most of the .so's in our > build are made using Makefile.shlib, pgxs's "MODULES" build rules > don't > use that. Instead they rely on the "%.so: %.o" (and platform-specific > variants of that) rules found in src/makefiles/Makefile*. And on most > platforms we've neglected to include LDFLAGS_SL in those rules. This > seems like an oversight, especially since the one platform that has > nonempty LDFLAGS_SL by default (AIX) does include LDFLAGS_SL. > > This seems like a clear bug. I'm hesitant to back-patch a change like > that, but not hesitant to fix it in HEAD. I think this issue is brought up about once a year. You might want to review previous discussions.
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: