Re: Parallel safety of binary_upgrade_create_empty_extension
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Parallel safety of binary_upgrade_create_empty_extension |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 12775.1522330010@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Parallel safety of binary_upgrade_create_empty_extension (Thomas Munro <thomas.munro@enterprisedb.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Parallel safety of binary_upgrade_create_empty_extension
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Thomas Munro <thomas.munro@enterprisedb.com> writes: > Presumably also cursor_to_xmlschema. I also found some more > suspicious brin and gin modifying functions. So I think the list of > functions that needs to be marked 'u' so far is: > * binary_upgrade_create_empty_extension > * pg_import_system_collations > * brin_summarize_range > * brin_summarize_new_values > * brin_desummarize_range > * gin_clean_pending_list > * cursor_to_xml > * cursor_to_xmlschema > Has anyone got anything else? There are some tsquery functions that execute user-supplied queries, and so need to be 'u' on the same grounds as the cursor_to_xml cases. I haven't checked to be sure if they are already so, but was planning to do so before considering this matter closed. regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: