Re: Patch to send transaction commit/rollback stats to the stats collector unconditionally.
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Patch to send transaction commit/rollback stats to the stats collector unconditionally. |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 12754.1395271672@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Patch to send transaction commit/rollback stats to the stats collector unconditionally. (Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Patch to send transaction commit/rollback stats to the
stats collector unconditionally.
Re: Patch to send transaction commit/rollback stats to the stats collector unconditionally. |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com> writes: > I'm not sure I understand the point of this whole thing. Realistically, > how many transactions are there that do not access any database tables? I think that something like "select * from pg_stat_activity" might not bump any table-access counters, once the relevant syscache entries had gotten loaded. You could imagine that a monitoring app would do a long series of those and nothing else (whether any actually do or not is a different question). But still, it's a bit hard to credit that this patch is solving any real problem. Where's the user complaints about the existing behavior? That is, even granting that anybody has a workload that acts like this, why would they care ... and are they prepared to take a performance hit to avoid the counter jump after the monitoring app exits? regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: