Re: Re: [ADMIN] v7.1b4 bad performance
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Re: [ADMIN] v7.1b4 bad performance |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 12736.982685944@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Re: [ADMIN] v7.1b4 bad performance (Hiroshi Inoue <Inoue@tpf.co.jp>) |
Ответы |
RE: Re: [ADMIN] v7.1b4 bad performance
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Hiroshi Inoue <Inoue@tpf.co.jp> writes: > I changed pgbench so that different connection connects > to the different database and got the following results. Hmm, you mean you set up a separate test database for each pgbench "client", but all under the same postmaster? > The results of > pgbench -c 10 -t 100 > [CommitDelay=0] > 1st)tps = 18.484611(including connections establishing) > tps = 19.827988(excluding connections establishing) > 2nd)tps = 18.754826(including connections establishing) > tps = 19.352268(excluditp connections establishing) > 3rd)tps = 18.771225(including connections establishing) > tps = 19.261843(excluding connections establishing) > [CommitDelay=1] > 1st)tps = 20.317649(including connections establishing) > tps = 20.975151(excluding connections establishing) > 2nd)tps = 24.208025(including connections establishing) > tps = 24.663665(excluding connections establishing) > 3rd)tps = 25.821156(including connections establishing) > tps = 26.842741(excluding connections establishing) What platform is this on --- in particular, how long a delay is CommitDelay=1 in reality? What -B did you use? regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: