Re: GDQ iimplementation
От | Simon Riggs |
---|---|
Тема | Re: GDQ iimplementation |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 1273590663.308.241.camel@ebony обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: GDQ iimplementation (Jan Wieck <JanWieck@Yahoo.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: GDQ iimplementation
|
Список | pgsql-cluster-hackers |
On Tue, 2010-05-11 at 10:38 -0400, Jan Wieck wrote: > Slony replication has meant both too from the beginning. You've done a brilliant job and I have huge respect for that. MHO: The world changes and new solutions emerge. Assimilation of technology into lower layers of the stack has been happening for years. The core parts of Slony should be assimilated, just as TCP/IP now exists as part of the OS, to the benefit of all. Various parts of Slony have already moved to core. Slony continues to have huge potential, though as part of an evolution, not in all cases fulfilling the same role it did at the beginning. Log shipping cannot easily exist outside of core, though SQL shipping can: but should it? How much more could we do? -- Simon Riggs www.2ndQuadrant.com
В списке pgsql-cluster-hackers по дате отправления: