Re: Statistics collector port / unix dom. socket?
От | Peter Sabaini |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Statistics collector port / unix dom. socket? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 1273002081.2590.7.camel@w-ehs-psa.telbiomed.at обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Statistics collector port / unix dom. socket? (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: Statistics collector port / unix dom. socket?
Re: Statistics collector port / unix dom. socket? |
Список | pgsql-admin |
On Tue, 2010-05-04 at 11:39 -0400, Tom Lane wrote: > Peter Sabaini <peter.sabaini@ait.ac.at> writes: > > it seems Postgres tries to send a UDP packet to a random high port to > > communicate with the statistics collector daemon. We have rather strict > > packet filter rules in place, and I'd like to make the system use a > > fixed port for this, or even better a Unix domain socket. Is this > > possible (setting a compile time or run time parameter)? > > No, the stats collector just uses whatever port bind() chooses for it. A pity. > I'd suggest backing off your ideas about how much filtering is > appropriate for local connections. Since we're running multiple database instances with different projects on one machine I'd like to isolate them as best I can. Thanks anyway... peter. > > regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-admin по дате отправления: