Re: trivial DoS on char recoding
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: trivial DoS on char recoding |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 1271.1150841438@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | trivial DoS on char recoding (Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@commandprompt.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: trivial DoS on char recoding
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@commandprompt.com> writes: > Note that the PO file for the spanish translation is written in Latin1, > not UTF8. So I can adventure that the server is trying to recode a > string which is originally in Latin1, but assuming it is UTF-8, to > Win1250. Yeah, this is a known problem --- basically it seems a shortcoming of the gettext() API. You can find details in the archives. > Should we get firmer in rejecting invalid configurations? The question is how sure are we whether a configuration is "invalid". AFAIK there's not a really portable way to determine which encoding matches a locale. initdb has a kluge that seems to work most of the time, but do we want the database to refuse to start when it doesn't? regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: